THE REPUBLICAN BRAIN PDF
Bestselling author Chris Mooney uses cutting-edge research to explain the psychology behind why today's Republicans reject reality—it's just part of who they. Certain to spark discussion and debate, The Republican Brain also promises to add to the . He pulled up a pdf opinion piece on a Blog. Start by marking “The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science—and Reality” as Want to Read: Bestselling author Chris Mooney uses cutting-edge research to explain the psychology behind why today's Republicans reject reality—it's just part of who they are.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Dutch|
|Genre:||Fiction & Literature|
|ePub File Size:||29.39 MB|
|PDF File Size:||18.80 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Regsitration Required]|
Republicans (conservatives) did not differ, their brain activity did. .. Supporting Information. Appendix S1. (PDF). Author Contributions. Friends of Democracy Corps. From: Stan Greenberg and James Carville. Mapping the Republican Brain. Six underlying attitudinal dimensions. The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science — and Reality is a book . Create a book · Download as PDF · Printable version.
Anyone who has spent time arguing politics on the Internet will not be surprised at this finding. Again, these are tendencies, not universals.
Live Chat: The Political Brain
The social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, whose book The Righteous Mind covers some of the same ground as The Republican Brain but without the partisan overlay uses the metaphor of a rider sitting atop a giant elephant. The rider is our reason; the elephant, our instincts, emotions, and psychological needs. Are Conservatives Worse? Where The Republican Brain departs from Haidt and other social psychologists is in claiming that conservatives are more likely to engage in motivated reasoning in defense of their politics.
Mooney devotes a good part of the book arguing that modern day conservatives are wrong on a whole host of issues ranging from global warming to the effect of Obamacare on the federal deficit. For obvious reasons, these arguments are more likely to appeal to those who share Mooney's liberal politics.
But even if he were right in every case, this wouldn't be sufficient to justify the claim that conservatives are inherently more biased. To do that, you would have to show conservatives have been more biased and anti-scientific over the whole scope of human history. When one considers left-wing sympathy for pseudo-scientific theories such as Marxist economics, Lysenkoist biology, or Freudian psychoanalysis, there is reason to be skeptical.
The "asymmetry thesis" also runs contrary to social psychologists' understanding of how motivated reasoning works. Dan Kahan recently summed up this point nicely: People have a big stake--emotionally and materially--in their standing in affinity groups consisting of individuals of like-minded goals and outlooks. Because these groups aren't either "liberal" or "conservative"--indeed, aren't particularly political at all--it would be odd if this dynamic would manifest itself in an ideologically skewed way in settings in which the relevant groups are ones defined in part by commitment to common political or cultural outlooks.
To support his thesis, Mooney cites a meta-analysis of 88 separate surveys comparing personality and political views, conducted by a team of psychologists headed by John Jost of New York University.
The Jost study found conservatives were more likely to exhibit dogmatism, intolerance of ambiguity, and general closed-mindedness. Since liberals are more open to experience, Mooney argues, it stands to reason that they would be more open to contrary points of view, and so will feel less need to use motivated reasoning to swat down evidence that conflicts with their own cherished beliefs. In the last chapter of The Republican Brain, Mooney describes a study he helped design and carry out along with Everett Young, a psychology post-doc.
In the study, students at Louisiana State University were quizzed on their political beliefs as well as their views on a variety of subjects both political global warming and nuclear power and non-political Lady Gaga and Drew Brees.
They were then presented with short essays that either supported or criticized their prior views. But, never the less, I had to read this book.
The absolute denial of facts as they are pointed out to them confounds me. Finally an explanation. And that he has a plan to destroy America from within and a plan on world domination? I guess, but the good news is that all of that is false.
No, it has to be true; they said it on the TV machine. His religion should not be a factor anyway.
Browse more videos
How do you force non-pregnant women to abort a non-existent pregnancy? Health care needs reforming and there are no death panels.
Have you seen Michelle? He probably has a time machine and he took it back to to plant the birth certificate and the article so he could become president to destroy America!
Chris Mooney calls this motivated reasoning.
When you believe something as strongly as Skeeter does it becomes almost physical in the brain and nothing short of surgery can remove this belief. Think about the cults who predict the end of the world, it never happens, yet these people are so invested in this belief that they always come up with a new date, rather than admit to themselves they made a mistake.
Skeeter is extreme, a closed minded authoritarian according to the author.
The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science—and Reality
Not all Republicans are this extreme, but they are most certainly closed minded by definition.Climate change. Republicans distort facts for their benefit far more often than Democrats--global warming and history are cited most in this book, al Chris Mooney wrote The Republican Brain from a liberal perspective, geared toward other liberal readers.
He is not particularly critical of the research he describes, but also certainly doesn't overplay the value of any study or body of work. This means that education matters, and the type of education offered matters. Poptech was also responsible for a smear campaign a few years back on one of the desmog members.
Are Conservatives from the Amygdala, 7. He also includes ways liberals also deny science, so he's not arguing that these personality traits are true across the board, just general tendencies. Error 3: Mr.
Share this:. This really isn't to say that either group is smarter or better people, but the author does point on how the results can be problematic, or even catastrophic.