SUSAN KAY PHANTOM PDF
Kay, Susan - Phantom - Free ebook download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read book online for free. Susan Kay's Phantom is my favorite book of all time and probably my favorite version of Phantom as You can download it in PDF format here. PHANTOM SUSAN KAY PDF | ppti.info From Publishers Weekly Retelling and expanding upon a well known and beloved classic is risky business.
|Language:||English, Spanish, French|
|Genre:||Academic & Education|
|ePub File Size:||28.75 MB|
|PDF File Size:||14.42 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Regsitration Required]|
Susan Kay's Phantom is the unbelievably tragic and dramatic story of novel character Erik [PDF]Phantom by Susan Kay Book Free Download ( pages. Phantom is a novel by Susan Kay, based on the Gaston Leroux novel The Phantom of the .. Create a book · Download as PDF · Printable version. download phantom by susan kay pdf - phantom by susan kay. handy etui touchscreen tpu sto??fest shockproof tasche slimcase outdoor handyh??lle.
The second half of 'Phantom' is a total let-down - and to be perfectly frank I think most of it really sucks. First of all, we find out that Christine Daae bears an uncanny resemblance to Madeleine, Erik's mother. Now surely I can't be the only person who finds this a bit creepy and Freudian?! And besides, Madeleine hated Erik and vice versa so wouldn't Christine's physical resemblance to his mother be off-putting to him?
Another thing that I found extremely irritating about this book are the bizarre alterations from Leroux's original story that occur. It's really strange because Kay has obviously made an effort, in the first half of this book at least, to keep Erik's physical appearance and backstory accurate to Leroux's descriptions - but when she actually comes to the story that we all know and love she makes weird changes.
I'm sure that Kay probably wanted to put her own twist on things and to make the story her own but the way that she did this was just too fanfiction-y and off-canon for my tastes.
There are so many scenes in this book that supposedly take place in Leroux's novel but are in reality nothing like those scenes at all. For example: Leroux's novel has Carlotta croak like a toad on the same night that the chandelier falls, but in Kay's 'Phantom' the chandelier falls on a different night much later on.
The unmasking scene here is nothing like the unmasking scene in Leroux's novel. By far the most cringeworthy scene in this book has to be the one where Christine hears Erik's music for Don Juan Triumphant. The music is described as being like a sob in Leroux's novel, as the ultimate expression of grief and rage. Christine is frightened and disturbed. Okaaay then The book then proceeds to delve even further into the realms of bad fanfiction.
I get the strong impression that Kay didn't like how Leroux's novel ended and decided to twist and distort the characters and events of that novel to suit her own purposes like a lot of bad fanfiction writers do. I think he's a fantastic character and very sympathetic. In Kay's novel, I felt barely any sympathy for him at all. Also, I can't say that I was ever a massive fan of Christine in Leroux's novel because I never really found her all that interesting but reading Kay's novel actually made me appreciate her a whole lot more.
OK, Christine does come across as being a bit helpless in Leroux's novel but at least she had some backbone. She was in love with Raoul and was determined to save him.
In Kay's novel, Christine is completely incapable of making decisions by herself and seems incredibly childish and bratty. I know that Christine is supposed to be naive and a very young and innocent girl from reading Leroux's novel - childlike as opposed to childish - but Kay seems to take this to mean that 'Christine is stupid and mentally challenged'. Er, no she isn't! Kay strips Christine of every ounce of intelligence and integrity that she has in Leroux's novel and what we have instead is an incredibly annoying character.
She also has an aggravating habit of always saying exactly the wrong thing to Erik and she uses Raoul horribly. Basically, she only runs off to Raoul in this book whenever Erik has done something to upset her: Raoul is just some tool for Christine to punish Erik with. I felt really sorry for Raoul in this book and he must surely deserve some sort of medal for the crap that he has to put up with! Christine ends up sleeping with Erik right before their wedding - hmm, what recent musical does this remind me of?!
"A MOVING RE-CREATION OF THE BELOVED CLASSIC."
She then takes Erik's cat to live with them and has a son that turns out to be Erik's! Poor Raoul has to put up with the fact that his wife, his son and even his pet are all Erik's! How harsh is that? To sum up: And if you're not, don't bother. Give me the Leroux novel and the ALW musical anyday! Aug 07, Nasim. Aug 03, A.
Howard rated it it was amazing. I have no words for how amazing this book is. The character of Erik fascinated me, but I resented it when Christine and Raoul interrupted his story; they seemed almost superfluous, they bored me, they got in the way.
So when Susan Kay's Phantom was recommended, I jumped at the chance to discover more about the enigmatic Erik. Phantom begins with his birth; horribly disfigured, he's instantly rejected by his mother, a rejection which will impac Rating: Phantom begins with his birth; horribly disfigured, he's instantly rejected by his mother, a rejection which will impact upon his life forever. Persuaded by a priest to take him home and care for him but to never show him in public, the first thing she does is fashion a mask for her newborn son.
But the mask cannot disguise her revulsion and the care she gives him is the basic minimum, unable and unwilling to show him any love or affection. Hers is the first rejection of many, and as Erik grows from boy to man he suffers every humiliation and betrayal, retreating into the angry solitary life he creates for himself, living by his own set of rules and hardening his mind against humanity. Precociously gifted and perpetually feared, he travels the world with his mesmerising talents and murderous tendencies, but beneath the cruel exterior lies a man with a heart and soul, desperate for love and acceptance however suppressed those feeling might be; this heart and soul are glimpsed by a very select few who lives are touched by his loyal and gentle compassion.
Up until this point, I adored everything about this novel. It's haunting and heartbreaking, and oh how my heart bled for this tender, terrifying man. Unfortunately, the book came undone for me in the last quarter where it joins forces with The Phantom of the Opera in a virtual retelling of Christine and Raoul's part. With my preconceived dislike of them I accept that I'm to blame here, but I lost interest and began skim-reading; a frustrating end to an otherwise utterly riveting read.
View all 4 comments. Mar 10, Jamie rated it it was amazing. Oh boy. I could talk about this book for longer than it takes to read it, but I think I can sum up my feelings on it in one sentence.
It is my absolute favorite novel that I have ever read. I have read quite a few novels. It's hard to decisively say which is my favorite. That is, it would be hard, had I not read this book.
I've been in a sort of love affair with the story of the Phantom of the Opera for a year or so now. It started with a webcomic. That's another story. Right now we're talking abou Oh boy. Right now we're talking about an absolutely brilliant book. I've read this book cover to cover twice. The first time, while it affected me, I really hadn't thought about the character enough to realize how in-depth the story goes. The second time I read it, I could only read a couple of pages at a time before having to put it down because of how damn powerful it is.
Kay, Susan - Phantom
Susan Kay really knows how to use characters and the dynamics between them. Every relationship is believable, from that of Madeleine to Marie to Erik and Nadir. They all have their distinct characterizations. Kay has created what is one of the best books that very few people seem to know about.
I would recommend it to literally anyone. I first read this book when I was 14, so it's hard to know how I would have felt about it if I'd read it now, because it is so deeply ingrained in how I approach the Phantom mythology and the character of Erik. That said, I loved this book so much at 14 I remember reading the book during my freshman year classes, and then reading the whole thing over and over and over. Even now, I can pick up this book, flip to any random page, and just love wherever I'm at.
There are only 2 other books I can do I first read this book when I was 14, so it's hard to know how I would have felt about it if I'd read it now, because it is so deeply ingrained in how I approach the Phantom mythology and the character of Erik.
There are only 2 other books I can do that with. This is the reason why I love how goodread's star system work. The stars don't indicate "good book, ok book, bad book" but "I loved the book, I liked the book, etc. And just BTW -- why are so many reviewers calling him Eric? It's Erik. With a K. Sep 10, Cailin rated it it was amazing.
This is one of my favorite books. If you like the story of the Phantom of the Opera, you'll be both astounded and heartbroken by Susan Kay's portrayal of Eric's life - from his birth, to after his death. Often, with tales from the "bad guy's" perspective, you start to feel sorry for the antagonist. The traditional Phantom of the Opera does this already; you feel sorry for the "bad guy," but you ultimately end up siding with Christine.
Phantom does something a little different. You fall in love wi This is one of my favorite books. You fall in love with him, you obsess over him and with him, you despair with him, you agree with his every action and cheer him on, and you're surprised by his strength and intellect on every single page.
And don't worry, you can see his art and hear his music as you read. Yes, it's THAT awesome. Sep 18, Gemma rated it it was amazing Shelves: I've met my match. I have never ever ever come across a book, barring this one, that I just couldn't handle reading for extended periods of time. Not because it was bad, but because it was just so darn sad!
I'm a huge fan of Leroux's original novel and I'm always nervous about reading anything to do with Phantom of the Opera I'm still recovering from The Phantom of Manhattan , but there really wasn't anything to worry about with this one. Susan Kay did a remarkable job of fleshing out Erik's pre I've met my match.
Susan Kay did a remarkable job of fleshing out Erik's previously shadowy past. Her original characters were well-drawn; I still have mixed feelings about Madeleine and I liked Giovanni almost as much as Nadir. The part that concerned me the most turned out to be the part that most blew me away: Erik's characterization.
It wasn't overdone or understated, it was just right. The pain, the passion, the madness It turned me into a sniffling, sobbing wreck! I do have just one little problem with it, though. From Erik's birth to his taking up residence in the Opera House was told in such detail that when Christine finally arrived on the scene, it seemed to fly by too fast by comparison. It was the most pivotal, important relationship of Erik's tormented life, and as such it should have been treated with more thought.
And yet I have to hand it to Ms. She worked me over so well with the last scene at the house on the lake I wanted to tear my hair out in anguish. It was so intense and so electrically charged I couldn't sleep after reading it which was pretty rough, as I couldn't stop thinking about it, thus furthering the torment. And the last bits from Raoul's perspective were rather touching, which came as a surprise since he seemed like such a minor character up until then.
All in all, a must-read for phans and heck, anyone who needs a good cry. Take the advice I didn't, and keep the tissues handy! May 19, Eric rated it it was amazing. I first heard about this book when I happened to see an interview with Hugh Panaro, the then-star of "Phantom of the Opera" on Broadway.
He suggested the text as required reading for anyone looking to play the character of the Phantom or anyone looking to understand his character on a deeper level.
Since "Phantom of the Opera" is hands-down my favorite Broadway show, and since I promised my father that I would find a way to produce the show with the Drama Club I direct, I thought I'd give it a I first heard about this book when I happened to see an interview with Hugh Panaro, the then-star of "Phantom of the Opera" on Broadway.
Since "Phantom of the Opera" is hands-down my favorite Broadway show, and since I promised my father that I would find a way to produce the show with the Drama Club I direct, I thought I'd give it a whirl.
I was impressed with Kay's knowledge of the source material. Rather than simply looking over Lloyd Webber's Broadway show or a movie version, she went back to the original material of Gaston Leroux. She sets her story initially long before the events of Leroux's novel; her focus is on the character of Erik, the "phantom.
Taking a cue from both Leroux and Lloyd Webber, Kay spins a tale of a young man with tremendous talents who faces scorn and isolation because of his unfortunate deformation. Kay slowly unfolds the character of Erik, providing him with sufficient backstory to explain his talents and abilities while simultaneously peppering his life with events to mold his character and response to humanity. The most interesting thing is that Kay accomplished this through a variety of narrators.
Each phase of Erik's life is told to the reader through the eyes of a new figure; Erik only narrates about one-third of the book. The use of outside perspectives to narrate the bulk of the story offers a certain objectivity to the reader. The reader can generally relate to the narrator more than Erik since the narrator often mirrors the perspective the reader would likely have.
This allows for a deeper sympathetic reaction to Erik's trials and tribulations than would be possible were it Erik who was telling his own story the whole way through. If you like "Phantom of the Opera" in any of its iterations , this is a must-read. This novel seems to flawlessly set up every mysterious bit of The Phantom of the Opera , only to then proceed to fix every "mistake" of the story. At first I was baffled by how diligently Kay wove the tapestry of Erik's only life to scream "screw you!
I'll be the first to admit it - I have never finished the original novel; however, I do consider myself a connoisseur of the stage show, and know enough of the work it's based upon to realize just how many liberties Kay dec This novel seems to flawlessly set up every mysterious bit of The Phantom of the Opera , only to then proceed to fix every "mistake" of the story.
I'll be the first to admit it - I have never finished the original novel; however, I do consider myself a connoisseur of the stage show, and know enough of the work it's based upon to realize just how many liberties Kay decided to take with the classic work. If you read Phantom with no prior knowledge of the story it's paying homage to, it would still be a good novel with character development and plot and good pacing. But what amazed me as a fan and Team Erik member for five years was the new depth that Kay managed to give to Christine and the Phantom.
She royally ignored every other character such as Giry, Meg, and Raoul; although, the work done with those such as Erik's mother and the ones involved early in his life - the ones who shaped him into the twisted man we see when the show begins - makes it okay in the end. Questions I have had burning on my mind have been answered. Even if they aren't "official," they still bring light to the situations left as mysteries, along with giving motive to what seems as pure madness in previous tellings.
Along with that, I've talked with many people who wonder why in the world Erik loves Christine. She comes across as a pretty bimbo with no personality or emotions or depth. And yet, Kay tackled this problem head on. We see her through a lens in Erik's mind that actually makes sense, but then again, Kay did alter major plot points, so who knows?
One issue for me personally was Erik's child narration occasionally reading too much like an adult, making it hard to stay invested in what was happening in the story. He is a prodigy, but I do feel as if he could have sounded more like a highly intelligent boy rather than a man. Pushing aside the voice, his childhood was interesting and well planned. All in all, I think this is a good read for any Phantom fan. Reading this work, it feels as is Kay enjoyed the ideas, people, and themes of the work but reconstructed what happened to her own liking.
It bites its thumb at the original, yes, but the added dimensions to the characters doesn't make this seem like too much of a loss. Jun 01, N. This is definitely a must-read for any Phantom fan! There are truly no words to explain the beauty and the humanity that Erik a. The Phantom possesses in this book. It made me cry, it made me laugh, it made me gasp in horror and tremble with anticipation. Susan Kay does a fantastic job capturing the war-ravaged heart of Erik, giving him a horrible, loveless background but a deep-set humanity that surpasses all expectations.
It is needless to say that I fell in love with this man for the beau This is definitely a must-read for any Phantom fan! It is needless to say that I fell in love with this man for the beauty of his feelings, the innocence in his heart and the darkness that threatens to consume his soul.
Every narrative moment is precious and truly captivating. This is a book that I will definitely re-read it. Even if you're not a Phantom of the Opera fan, this is an excellent book all on it's own. You too will fall under his spell and reach out for that strong hand that lead you to the Music of the Night.
Dec 06, Basil rated it it was amazing Shelves: I first read this one as a teenager, when I went through my Phantom of the Opera obsession phase.
I mean, didn't we all? I still pull this book out every few years and reread it -- and it always holds up. The writing borders on purple sometimes, but rarely if ever actually crosses the line.
And the story I mean, where to begin? Five stars. Let's leave it at that. Apr 04, E. Bucchianeri rated it it was amazing Shelves: The story of the Phantom, the man with a devil's face and an angel's voice, has inspired many fan-based fictions and professional re-creations.
The urge to explore the characters in more depth is difficult to ignore: Gaston Leroux left many blanks and character-development enigmas that remain unanswered in his novel. Why did Christine refuse to leave with Raoul, her sweetheart, when he provided the opportunity to escape? Did she really love Erik but was afraid to admit it? The biggest mystery is Erik's life: Leroux hints at the sad details in the Epilogue of his novel, but that is all they are, vague glimpses into a shattered childhood and loveless existence.
In a few paragraphs, Leroux declares Erik's father was a stonemason and that he was born in a small town on the outskirts of Rouen. Because of his facial deformity, he was an object of horror and shame to his parents and was forced to run away. How he was treated and how long he was forced to live like this, we do not know. Erik's talents also extended to many other fields, architecture being one, and he travelled to the Middle East, entering into the service of the Shah of Persia and the Sultan of Turkey.
In addition to constructing some of the palaces, he entertained his royal employers with his inventions and magic arts, in the process he became privy to many state secrets.
However, because he knew too much, was compelled to flee the executioner both times. He finally returned to France and the rest is history as they say. Leroux focused his story on just the last six months or so of Erik's tragic yet adventurous life, and leaves all the rest.
Is it a wonder Phans want to hear more? Kay delves into the depths of the human element of the story where Leroux concentrated on the mystery-thriller aspect of his novel. Of course, Kay had to use her own imagination to fill the blanks, and there are many parts and new characters that are her own invention, such as Erik's providential introduction to an Italian stonemason during his teenage years, and his first experience of falling in love only to have it end in tragedy, meaning Christine is not his first love according to Kay.
Kay also rewrites what happens at the opera house since she cannot complete rehash Leroux's work, which would be plagiarism, but I think he would be pleasantly surprised by her re-working of the story if he could read it today.
In addition to her emotionally-charged exploration of the characters, Kay's research into the history of the times is very accurate and she handles the story in its historical context admirably. Furthermore, her writing style is a pleasure to read. This a page-turner from beginning to end. Definitely worth a Five-Star rating. A note to parents, if you are wondering if this is for suitable for Young Adults YA , I would suggest you read it first: I read this novel a long time ago.
I remember I was a teenager when I read this book. I've read it like 5 times and it still makes me burst in emotions. I remember the book's edge slightly peeping between others in my parents book shelf, all red and full of dust.
I just wanted to read something and I was instantly drawn to pick it up. And when I did, I blew the dust away and there I saw the beautiful cover. A golden mask, the name "Phantom of the Opera" by Susan Kay in all its red background glo I read this novel a long time ago. A golden mask, the name "Phantom of the Opera" by Susan Kay in all its red background glory. I was fifteen years old at the time I already new the original popular story. But, curiosity got the best of me.
It's pages old and yellow. And that smell!!!! You know how old books smell? How could I refuse? Once I began reading, it was a rollercoaster of emotions.
I felt disgusted, I cried, I felt admiration, passion, frustration. I couldn't stop reading it no matter how it hurt!!! I was lovestruck and enamored! Susan kay takes us to the very begining of the Phantom's existence, even before he became a ghost of a theater. We withstand Eric's history and how he evolves from a genius to a mad man in love. There are certain slight changes in the characters actions, but that does not alter the beauty and horror of this novel.
Christine has more childish personality, although I've never liked her,this version is much more likebale. Raul reminds me of "Gaston" from 'Beauty and the beast'. Other than slight details, the story maintains its true origins. But it allows us to live the Phantoms struggles with every detail of his history. With exquisite pace and detail.
And as soon as I finished reading it, I couldn't help smile between tears. To summarize I highly recommend this book!!! And it deserves full 5 stars! I bid you farewell and hope your future reads are fab! Mar 10, rachel rated it liked it Shelves: I love Phantom of the Opera more than But, of course, there are a few problems.
I think this book a phenomenal retelling of the origianl work, and I appreciated how she attempted to stay somewhat close to Gaston Leroux's, and I enjoyed learning about Erik's past, whether or not it was true. I had some problems I love Phantom of the Opera more than I had some problems, though, with the blatant Christine x Erik pairing. Personally, I don't like the two of them together, and I don't believe that they would ever be together. The ending was also hard for me to appreciate with the boy probably being Erik's and with Christine dying so soon after Erik.
I felt like Kay almost didn't give Christine enough credit - she made Christine weak and fragile, the damsel in distress. While, yes, I would agree that she is the damsel in this novel, it was frustrating how no one seems to realize that Christine kissed the Phantom in order to save Raoul, and I feel like that was kind of a major downfall for me?
Like that she still insisted on making Christine be in love with Erik. That was such a small portion of the book, though, and I definitely think the rest of it was amazing. I loved Nadir's relationship with Erik, especially, and his love for Nadir's son. Dec 19, Michele Harrod rated it it was amazing. Oh, I have just found my copy of this book. I brought it years ago, in England and have loaned this book to so many people now the pages are barely still in tact along the spine, and the cover is threadbare.
But I will keep it forever - as this is one of the finest, most heart rending explorations of a 'character' - that I had already become completely intrigued with after seeing the opera in London. The book gave said character more life than anything I have ever experienced on stage. Erik, for Oh, I have just found my copy of this book. Erik, for me, became such a complete character, that I feel I almost knew him.
Through this work, he become someone I feared and pitied. He was alive and beloved to me. A character, truly brought to life by the hands of this incredible author. I simply cannot recommend this highly enough. And I don't recall a single person who borrowed this book, not loving it too. Apr 12, Michelle rated it it was amazing Shelves: What can I say about this book, really?
This was a re-read. A re-read, in fact, of many many times. I've lost count of how many times I've read this book since it first came out in the early s. The book tells the story of Erik's the Phantom of the Opera life from birth to death.
Kay does an amazing job with taking those little hints Leroux gives about Erik's life and expanding them out into believable sections that ultimately shaped the man to become who is seen in the Leroux novel which What can I say about this book, really?
Kay does an amazing job with taking those little hints Leroux gives about Erik's life and expanding them out into believable sections that ultimately shaped the man to become who is seen in the Leroux novel which really chronicles only the last 6 months of his life. This story is amazingly beautiful and every time I read it I am sucked into a story so vivid, so wondrous, so heartbreaking, that I end up weeping at the end. I highly recommend it.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Readers Also Enjoyed. About Susan Kay. In Phantom, when Christine won't let him have his way, he stalks off to sulk until his next encounter with her.
Since Christine seems to have mysteriously lost her fear of the Phantom, and therefore doesn't need to turn to Raoul for protection, Raoul becomes nothing more than a prodding figure.
Then there's Christine and Erik. In other versions, the Phantom has the shadow of his disfigurement hanging over him and it distorts his soul. In those versions, it's Christine who shows him love and kindness and helps him find the good in himself. In Phantom, it's the other way around.
Despite his tendency to murder people and kidnap people and act like a sociopath, Erik becomes the enlightened figure in Kay's novel. The more Christine is around him, the more educated she becomes, the more deeply she thinks about things. She starts to become ashamed of herself because she doesn't have the courage to touch him. She realizes that the Phantom has loved her as no man has loved a woman before. And yet, I'm not convinced. Because he lies to her?
Kills in order to possess her? Yells at her for, say, asking him to kill a spider? Or perhaps it's because he is only content to let her go and yet STILL doesn't when he realizes that she likes him best. It occurred to me that this was the sort of story I would expect to read in a fan fiction, where the story didn't turn out the way some fangirl wanted it to, so she twists and distorts the situations and the characters to fit her own means.
Don't get me wrong. I adore the Phantom. I think he's a phenomenal character. But this, to me, is not a great love story.At nine years old Erik's mother begins to respond to the attentions of the handsome, new town physician, which upsets Erik.
They walked together to the piano. It was the evening of his fifth birthday and I was expecting Marie for supper. It was the only room in the house that contained a mirror and he was forbidden to go in there; but I did not trust his obedience to last once I was out of his sight.
Even if he had contrived to push the key from the lock and slide it underneath the door. I felt really sorry for Raoul in this book and he must surely deserve some sort of medal for the crap that he has to put up with! Or perhaps a box of sweets… "What is it you want? It must be dead.
- WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT KEVIN BOOK
- JAVA CRYPTOGRAPHY PDF
- MIND READING BOOKS PDF
- MAJALAH TRUBUS PDF
- SHL NUMERICAL REASONING TEST PDF
- TERJEMAHAN KITAB FATHUL IZAR PDF
- BANKING AND YOU MAGAZINE PDF
- PDF GIANT MAGAZINES FOR FREE
- NETWORK SECURITY CHARLIE KAUFMAN PDF
- MASUD RANA BOOK PDF
- SELENIUM EMBEDDED PDF
- INJECTION MOULD DESIGN.PDF
- MATERIALES COMPUESTOS PDF