THE TWILIGHT SAGA NEW MOON BOOK
New Moon is a romantic fantasy novel by author Stephenie Meyer, and is the second novel in Jump to navigation Jump to search. "Twilight 2" redirects here. For the film adaptation of this novel, see The Twilight Saga: New Moon. New Moon is a fantasy novel by author Stephenie Meyer, and is the second novel in the Twilight series. According to Meyer, the book is about losing true love . ppti.info: New Moon (The Twilight Saga) (): Stephenie Meyer: Books.
|Language:||English, Spanish, French|
|ePub File Size:||15.85 MB|
|PDF File Size:||14.57 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Regsitration Required]|
The Twilight Saga: New Moon--The Official Illustrated Movie Companion [Mark Cotta Vaz] on Book 2 of 4 in the Twilight Movie Companion Series. How close was the Film the Twilight saga: new moon was to this book? Kate As confirmed by Stephanie, The new moon is when the moon is away from the. New Moon is a young adult fantasy/romance novel by Stephenie Meyer. It is the second novel in the Twilight Saga and was published in.
That entire part was rushed and anti-climatic. There isn't even a fight scene. Anyway, they get back to good old Forks and Bella composes a vote on everyone's thoughts of her joining team undead. Edward is at a steady "no" along with Rosalie. But everyone else says, "Hell yes! Funny thing is when Bella asks Jasper he goes: And she's all: Hmm, yeah, that's not weird at all.
Not the least bit creepy. In the last few pages Edward and Jake have a little pissing contest and Edward proposes to Bella. The End. Thank God it's over. Now where's my fuckin' chocolate? My Twilight Review can be found here.
If I were to light Edward on fire what would he become? View all comments. Feb 27, Miranda Reads rated it really liked it Shelves: Really cringing at my younger self..
And yet I still loved it So, I guess I'm cringing at my older self too. Before you, Bella, my life was like a moonless night. Very dark, but there were stars, points of light and reason. And then you shot across my sky like a meteor. Suddenly everything was on fire When Bella gets a paper cut during her birthday, she in typical ridiculously unstable fashion slices her arm open and stuffs it with glass.
She becomes surrounded by seven thirsty vampires. W Really cringing at my younger self.. While she manages to make it out alive, Edward is horrified by what his family has the potential to do. How is this a surprise? They're bloody vampires. Edward does the sensible thing and completely erases himself from her life. Bella does the sensible thing and completely erases her mind. She throws herself into this weird fugue state for the first few chapters.
I honestly have no idea how to live without you. Codependency for the win. Seriously, their relationship is so messed up when I think about it.
I mean technically it isn't statuary but give Edward a few wrinkles and a stooped walk Looking back now, I don't understand how I was Team Edward for this book. Poor Jacob did all that work with healing Bella only to get thrown aside as soon as a little sparkle dances her way. I remember my sixteen year old self absolutely crying when Bella goes into the fugue state after Edward leaves and bawling again when he came back. At least I don't feel the same now Picture a girl with the scratchy-cold voice.
That's every guy in the book. Blog Instagram Twitter View all 51 comments. Miranda Reads Mark wrote: May 24, Miranda Reads Katie wrote: I just can't enjoy them now. P May 24, Oct 21, Haleema rated it did not like it Shelves: This should suffice.
View all 36 comments. Apr 11, Amanda rated it liked it.
See a Problem?
Keep in mind that though this review is about to wheel off into an angry rant, this book is good. The series is addictive. And as I said previously about Stephanie Meyer, if you want to cease brain function for a few hours, she's your girl. The beginning is slow, the middle is gold, the end is lacking. The blank pages to represent months passed in zombie-depression, great idea. Now, my problem. My problem is not so much with the story as it is perhaps with the idea behind the story and thus, the a Keep in mind that though this review is about to wheel off into an angry rant, this book is good.
My problem is not so much with the story as it is perhaps with the idea behind the story and thus, the author herself. It all starts with Romeo and Juliet. Stupid kids. Yes, yes, the great tragedy of love. Please note the word tragedy came before the word love.
Because without the tragedy there would be no story. What would the story be otherwise? I'm not going to presume to rewrite Shakespeare at least not for the hypothetical purposes of illustrating a point in this review.
I will say, that I find it sad and unfortunate that Meyers insists on her characters not only admiring Romeo and Juliet not the play, but the hormone-addled teenagers who committed suicide rather than take a minute to think it through , but specifically referencing the star-crossed lovers in near direct comparison to her protagonist and the lover-vamp.
Her main character also can be caught reading Jane Austen, but more on that later. My point? Impossible love is a great story.
No doubt. And Meyer's characters, the human girl and the vampire um, Buffy and Angel anyone? Great, perfect, wonderful. The difficulty?
No where to go. That's what makes Romeo and Juliet a tragedy. That's why Buffy and Angel never got back together. What choices has she left us? Either the human becomes a vampire or the vampire in what would be a HUGE cheat becomes human again.
Make the human a vamp, right? Problem solved. Well, despite the flippancy with which so many of Meyer's characters approach this option, to do so would be a tragedy of sorts. Because in effect, it would be suicide, a life ended to be with the man she loves so senselessly that it makes you wonder how she could admire Jane Austen at all.
Yes, Jane Austen writes about love, but take a look at "Sense and Sensibility". Jane Austen recognizes that love is more complex than the simple lust of it while Romeo and Juliet barely get a chance to blink before they marry, screw and die-much like the carrion flies Romeo references.
Strength of character, not the sweaty passion, conquers all. Clear conscience and unerring moral fortitude conquers class-differences, social stigmas and familial disapproval. And so, they all get to live happily ever after. This is your dilemma Stephanie Meyers. You've laid the groundwork, not for a Jane Austen like happy-ending despite the odds, but a Shakespearian tragedy that will not only leave the audience sobbing, but foaming mad.
Frankly, the readers of today don't want a tragedy for the most part , they get that enough every day. They want the happy ending. I want the happy ending and what would that be in this situation? As far as I can see there is no way to have a true happy ending. Either you make a living girl a vampire. Or you pull out the deus ex machina and make the vampire a human. Neither option will be unsullied enough to be fully satisfactory. Personally, I would rather see the girl become a vampire, though I wish the character would take it a little more seriously than she has.
Because my sense of fairness would be violated if the vamp miraculously becomes a human. But no matter how it ends, I fear I will be disappointed, as the endings of both books have been so thoroughly let-downs I cannot imagine the author has it in her mind to tack a new course at this point.
How do I have the audacity to be so critical? Two, three? Not yet. View all 56 comments. Mar 13, Denys L. This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here. You may have heard me rant about the previous novel Twilight.
I decided to read the sequel, just to see if it will get better. Boy, was I wrong. First off, we began with Bella Swan bitching about how old she's getting, because Edward stays 17 forever, and since her birthday is coming up, she'll be one year older than her perfect lover.
What really makes me annoyed with this couple was the fact they were comparing their relationship with Romeo and Juliet.
It's nowhere even close to that because you two have no reason for loving each other! On a side note, Romeo and Juliet have no reason for loving each other, but they had a lesson in the story. They die anyways Anyways, they have a party and things get a little out of control when Bella cuts herself unintentionally and Jasper can't control his vampire needs. Edward realizes he needs to protect Bella, and in order to do that, he must go away with his family.
In order to pull an irritating fan girlfriend off your back is to hurt them really badly. And that's what he does.
Follow the Author
Bella decides that without Edward, she has no reason to live anymore, even though she unexplainably can hear him inside her mind. What a baby. Luckily, Jacob saves her from attempted suicide as I'm guessing, and starts hanging out with her. At this point in the story, I'm starting to hate Jacob a little less and begun to eventually like him, because he's more of an original character than Edward. He makes mistakes, unlike Edward. He has more of a potential and realistic relationship with Bella.
To top it all off, he's a werewolf and vampires so happen to be his worst enemy. However, things start to get more complicated in the story. When Bella figured out Edward was going to Italy to ask this vampire family to kill him because he thought Bella is dead from some misinterpretation.
Being the piss off as she is, she immediately pushes Jacob aside and her developing feelings and travels to Italy to stop Edward.
In the end, they're together. They don't need anyone else, only each other to survive. Fucking lunatics. I hate Edward now. He's just too unoriginal for me. Fan girls including Bella only love him because he's the hottest thing since ipods. They love an image of their boy dreams, but they hate the character that's actually more human than Edward, the sex god? What's the world coming to these days? I swear Jacob needs to get out of that retarded novel before Stephanie Meyer comes up with a way to make everyone have a reason to hate him.
Good job, babe, good job. Nov 13, Paul Bryant marked it as probably-never. When she was 12 me and my daughter Georgia went to see Twilight. After the movie I asked her what she thought. And she went to see it three more times, with people other than me. So she bought the book and read it in about four hours. I asked her what she thought. Then we got the dvd of the movie and she watched it again.
I was surprised but she explained - "Bella is stupid, Edwa When she was 12 me and my daughter Georgia went to see Twilight.
I was surprised but she explained - "Bella is stupid, Edward is stupid, nothing looks right, they miss out all the important stuff, it's so bad, it's so so so bad" Then she read all the other Twilight books in like four hours. By now she was Now aged 13 she's going to see the new Robert Pattinson movie Remember Me. I assume that's because he's so hideous and such a bad actor View all 48 comments.
Aug 01, Nicole rated it did not like it Recommends it for: Idiots and pre-teen girls who have never been kissed. Recommended to Nicole by: My inner child who has been thoroughly beaten and put to bed wit. I read Twilight and was sorely disappointed in it, but I had heard through a series of acquaintances that this one was better--that it introduced werewolves and slightly healthier relationships. I was deceived.
It was awful--not as bad as its predecessor, but still pretty bad. Right off the bat Bella is crying about how she hates her birthday and dreads aging and wants little to do with her birthday. This was a annoying to read through because I kept thinking to myself, "What teenage girl th Uhg.
This was a annoying to read through because I kept thinking to myself, "What teenage girl thinks this way? Skip to the party. She cuts herself and a unicorn cries, she is suddenly alone on the forest floor. Her life is over now that Edward gone. I found myself skimming though this sickeningly pitiful section like it was a high school biology book till I got to some substance.
Still devoid of any mannerisms, as are ALL the personnel of this series, but he's at least more dynamic. I liked him, but it was painful to see that Bella really only used him for her next "hallucination" fix.
She rambles on and on for hundreds of pages talking so much about the "hole in her chest" and how it burned and itched and stung and pussed and--well, showed all the good symptoms of a bad STD--that the plot seemed to vanish beneath her pained musings and constant reminders of Edward. The story continues along at the pace of a bike going uphill with square tires till--BAM--werewolves. This was nifty to me, having always liked werewolves with self-control and a purpose, but Meyer had no better way to describe them then "exploding.
It was boring at best, and even though this is painted on the walls from the first book, and used as a tool to beat you with during the introduction of Sam and his "cult," Bella is still oblivious.
An interesting aside to this "section" of the book: They actually introduce a character that is NOT beautiful, godlike, stunning or otherwise perfect. Emily, the wife of Sam, has a horrific scar pattern stretching across her face and down her arm. Here is where I got angry at the book. I'm not sure I've ever felt angry at a book before I read this last part. Bella is tired of waiting for her wolf-protector and decides to go cliff diving as previously mentioned in the beginning of the book.
As you might have guessed, she yet again fails miserably and nearly drowns, only to be saved yet again, but not before seeing VICTORIA--the shadowy plot device that has been loosely keeping this story together.
At this time I was thinking, "Ooooh! No more diary! We might actually have some conflict to gnaw on! Like a stereotypical sad-teenage-boy-that-needs-to-cut-himself-for-attention, Edward runs off to Italy to kill himself.
This is where I imagine Meyer had hit writers block, and decided to get her computer chair wet again by gushing over the painfully gross relationship that Bella and Edward share. She kicks Jacob and her father aside like used rags, and jet-sets out to Italy to an airport where apparently there is no immigrations office to herd you along for a few hours getting injected, inspected, detected, infected, neglected, selected and all kinds of crazy stuff , to save Edward.
One hundred pages of overdramatic swooning and crashing and hissing leads to Bella being exposed to the ugly side of vampire-lifestyle and the ultimatum that she has to become one or die. This was boring at best, with four chapters of frustrating mushy googly eyes and epiphanies that the condescending git, Edward, loves the paper-thin floozy Bella and she settles in for a marriage and a blood stained picket fence in Meyer's dress-up-game of angles and demons.
View all 34 comments. Jun 06, karen rated it liked it Shelves: Oct 03, Manny rated it liked it Shelves: As ye sow, so shall ye reap.
Earlier this year, I foolishly lent my copy of Twilight to Cate across the road. She liked it. Then, when she got a place at college last month, we thought we'd give her something as a congratulations-and-going-away present. It was so logical to buy a copy of New Moon. Cate zipped through it quickly, and dropped off her copy before leaving so that I could read it too. How could I possibly say anything except thank you? I've heard so muc As ye sow, so shall ye reap.
I've heard so much about this book, and I suppose it is interesting to see what people are talking about. But, Jesus Christ, Bella is eighteen and she's already obsessing about getting old. She keeps hassling Edward to turn her into a vampire so that she can stay young and pretty for ever.
There is some chance that this will result in her losing her immortal soul, but hey, seems worth the risk.
New Moon: The Graphic Novel
I suppose future ages may consider that this says something about early 21st century Western society. You don't exactly have to overexert your mind to come up with interpretations in that direction. Bella is a bright girl who gets mostly As and Bs at school, so why hasn't she stopped even for a second to consider the physics of vampires? To start with, where do they get their energy from? They don't really eat, they don't really drink, and they don't even need to breathe. Yet they're incredibly strong and fast.
OK, they claim they need blood every now and then. But not, apparently, very often, and how could they possibly get this amount of energy from the occasional liter of blood? Then they're hard, "like marble". In fact, if they didn't claim to be vampires, would we even think of calling them that? They certainly seem to be a lot more like humanoid robots.
And if you just follow up that hypothesis for a moment, several things fall into place. Their blood must surely be full of those little nanobots that are going to be the Next Big Thing. When a vampire bites a human, the nanobots get into the victim's bloodstream and start restructuring him from the inside out, replacing all the soft animal tissue with something far more durable.
That no doubt includes the brain too; they probably scan it and then map the structure onto software, a trick that's been standard in SF for several decades now. No wonder the "vampires" can think so uncannily fast. But if your brain has been scanned, destroyed, and turned into software, are you still the same person? You can see why Edward is warning Bella that she might lose her soul. It's a bit like turning an LP into a CD, a process that several of my classical musician friends describe in exactly those words.
And, going back to where we came in, where is their energy coming from? Those nanobots must have their own power source too. I must admit that I don't know what it is.
The fact that "vampires" don't seem to need any kind of material inputs suggests it's not chemical; nuclear seems more likely. Maybe they have some kind of catalyzed cold fusion, or it could be a post-quantum force that we haven't discovered yet.
After all, we're way overdue for the coming revolution in physics. Also, where did the nanobots come from, and why are "vampires" unhappy to be out in open sunlight? I can only see one sensible answer. They can't have been created by humans. They must be from elsewhere, which in practice means from another solar system. Probably they were originally created thousands of light-years from here, and have been drifting slowly on the cosmic currents for millennia.
Well, if their normal habitat is deep interstellar space, no wonder they're scared of sunlight. They wouldn't normally be this close to a star; they're not designed for it at all. And here's the thing that surprised me most. In fact, the story isn't irrelevant or far-fetched.
If people like Ray Kurzweil are right, it's tackling what could soon be a major issue. According to Kurzweil, the Singularity is supposed to arrive this century, and those nanobots will be a reality. Millions of people will have to make exactly the moral choice that Bella has to make in the book. Are you going to stay human, or allow yourself to be transformed into a godlike and near-immortal being, which might however not actually be you any more?
It's interesting that the books are appearing when they are, and present such a compelling emotional case for allowing yourself to be infected by nanobots. If you like conspiracy theories, feel free to speculate some more here. I mean, hating it would hardly be a challenge, would it? But every now and then, I get a passage like this one: I'd been broken beyond repair. But I needed Jacob now, needed him like a drug. I'd used him as a crutch for too long, and I was in deeper than I'd planned to go with anyone again.
Of course, there are some problems, starting with the fact that Stephenie Meyer can't write to save her life. But by making it a first-person narrative told by the shy, clumsy Bella, she has found an ingenious way to get around that. Bella's endearing klutziness is just a metaphor for her even more serious problems as a writer. As she keeps telling us, every time she walks across a room she wonders if she'll trip over her feet and end up in hospital; similar remarks apply to her ability to string together an eight word declarative sentence.
But she's stylistically consistent, and after a while I found myself accepting her. This just happens to be her voice, even though it's not a very good one. I also thought that she was a seriously unreliable narrator. Not about factual events; to start off with, she doesn't seem to be imaginative enough to make anything up.
We hear over and over again that she loves Edward, and only thinks of Jacob as a friend. But we also hear that Edward feels hard and cold to the touch. I couldn't help thinking of the wonderful scene in Mean Girls where Rachel McAdams's Cool Mom insists on giving Lindsay Lohan a silicone-enhanced hug; I'm sure that Bella often winces in just the same way when Edward hugs her, though she doesn't allow herself to notice it.
In contrast, Jacob is warm and alive, and she genuinely likes holding his hand and feeling him put his arm around her. There are several scenes when she nearly kisses him, knowing full well what that will lead to. It's clear that she wants to, and the excuses she makes to herself about him just being an unsatisfactory substitute for Edward are laughably unconvincing. I found the opposition between Edward and Jacob the heart of the book, and after a while I decided that the author was presenting something interesting and essentially honest.
The tricky thing is that she's subverted the vampire symbol. Usually, vampires represent the young girl's simultaneous dread and fascination in the face of sex. But Edward isn't very sexy.
We're always being told that he looks like an angel, and indeed there does seem to be an angelic purity about him. I find it much more plausible that he's representing religion, and when you think of him in those terms several other things come into focus.
As Richard Dawkins keeps telling us, a religion is a kind of virus, which infected parties want to spread as quickly as possible; well, vampirism is rather like that too. And Bella is very conflicted in her feelings about vampires.
She loves the Cullens, "her family", but she is well aware that most vampires are monsters. If you're brought up in a cult-like religion, that's not a bad metaphor. All other religions are evil and wrong; your own religion is the one exception to the rule. As everyone knows, Stephenie Meyer is a committed Mormon. It doesn't seem far-fetched to claim that Bella's feelings about vampires mirror the author's feelings about her religion, which among other things is very down on premarital sex.
And that's where the werewolves come in; they represent the normal sexual feelings that most young Mormon girls are taught to deny. The tension between these two conflicting attractions is what gives New Moon its undeniable force, and I found the story credible at an emotional level. I can readily believe that it's just like that to be a eighteen year old Mormon girl with a healthy sexual appetite, and I feel I understand their plight better after having read this book.
Well done, Stephenie! Aug 03, Scott rated it did not like it Recommends it for: I can't even Is anyone else completely aghast that this dreck saw a printing press not to mention became a wildly popular series? I thought I was being hard on Twilight when I criticized it for portraying a relationship so ill-advised and unhealthy and then romanticizing that relationship to young people as if people didn't already make enough bad decisions.
I thought maybe now that Book 1 was done the series would take a nice turn. New Moon. Shred of decency. Were it simply a I can't even Were it simply a problem of the weakly-developed characters, confused and uneven plotline, hundreds of pages of cloying depression only to be replaced by cloying sentimentality later on , and an appalling and unsubtle parallel to Romeo and Juliet, this novel would simply be mediocre teen fare.
But then we must consider the problem of Bella: Bella is only complete--and she says this herself--when her man is by her side. And apparently, according to Meyer at least, this is ok. It's ok to create a character so bereft of purpose, self-assurance, and identity that she can't live without a relationship based on nothing substantial, just beauty, lust, and exoticism.
And it's ok for her to experience no emotional maturity whatsoever because in the end, her lover comes back spewing the same gushy nonsense as before while still lording it over her and flying into rages when he doesn't get his way. The only compelling character in this story was Jacob. That is The irrational hatred between vampires and werewolves gets played off as instinctual, but it has all the logic of bigotry, and that these characters do nothing to try overcoming it is yet another way in which they are immature and non-self-examining.
Due to the audience for which this intended, I have to say that New Moon and the Twilight Saga as a whole are not just poor, they're damaging. And don't even get me started on the "epiphany" of p. We were expected to believe Bella thought Edward had ceased to love her even though an autistic housefly could see it was nowhere near true? This book failed. I'm sorry.
View all 17 comments. Aug 17, Lucy rated it did not like it Shelves: Bella Swan's relationship with her hot vampire boyfriend Edward Cullen is heating up when her characteristic clumsiness messes everything up again at her vampire-thrown birthday party.
In typical Bella style, she gives herself a paper cut and Edward has to literally throw himself in front of her to keep her from being dinner for six hungry vampires. That's the last straw for Edward, and he and his entire family pick up and leave to prevent any more harm from coming to Bella on their tab. Bella i Bella Swan's relationship with her hot vampire boyfriend Edward Cullen is heating up when her characteristic clumsiness messes everything up again at her vampire-thrown birthday party.
Bella is, of course, inconsolable, and walks through life like a lovesick zombie - until she renews her friendship with local boy Jacob Black. Jacob is a good friend - and more importantly, he helps Bella fix up two motorcycles and teaches her to ride them. Bella's friendship with Jacob - and the adrenaline rush that the motorcycles bring - sustains her, until she discovers a dangerous truth about the identity of Jacob and his friends - they are a pack of young werewolves.
And even worse, they have been working to protect her from a vicious vampire who has it in for Bella. After the horrible drudge that was Twilight, New Moon was a pleasant surprise. At least, part of it was, if you can get past Bella's melodramatic, lovesick, woe-is-me-I-am-the-center-of-the-universe depression.
I was actually starting to enjoy Bella's somewhat odd relationship with Jacob, and the book in general, which kind of surprised me - until Edward showed up again. Then, the writing dissolved once again to "I love you more, shmoopy. That's the problem with this book.
I like Bella with Alice. I like Bella with Carlisle and Esme. I like Bella with Jacob. I can't stand Bella with Edward. And let me rephrase that. There is nothing likeable about Bella as a character - she is a complete and total MarySue. Jacob is goodhearted and clever and interesting, and I have no trouble understanding why Bella is drawn to him. But why is Jacob drawn to Bella?
There seems to be no reason I can understand. And most laughable of all is Bella's desperate urge to become a vampire herself.
New Moon: The Graphic Novel
Especially at the end, when Edward asks her to marry him first, and she balks. She's afraid of commitment, but not of being turned into a vampire so she can stay with him always? Give me a break. View all 27 comments. Apr 02, Kai rated it really liked it Shelves: I love every single book and it's kind of hard for me to pick a favourite. This one, however, is probably my least favourite. However, Jacob sternly reminds Edward about an important part of their treaty: When Bella reminds him that it's none of his concern as being a vampire is what she wants, Jacob reveals it is his business as she doesn't understand what's going to be at stake for her and the Cullens.
Before he can continue warning her, they hear Charlie asking Bella to get inside the house at once. Jacob apologizes to Bella once more before leaving, and the story concludes with Charlie grounding Bella for running off to Italy. After Meyer finished writing Twilight , she found herself writing multiple, hundred-page epilogues, and has said, "I quickly realized I wasn't ready to stop writing about Bella and Edward. Meyer wrote New Moon in five months. She found the editing process "much longer and more difficult than the same process with Twilight.
However, Meyer considers Jacob to be her favorite gift the book gave, as she liked the character a lot and wanted to expand his role and presence. The confrontation with the Volturi in the clock tower at the end of the book was the first scene Meyer wrote. She did not want to use a real city as the location for the Volturi's residence, as she did with Forks.
Therefore, she chose Volterra and called it "a pretty creepy coincidence. The first draft of New Moon differed significantly from the manuscript published. Originally, Bella never found out that Jacob was a werewolf, and as a result, the seventy pages following Bella's discovery of Jacob's nature were missing.
The epilogue was also different in title and content. According to Meyer, the story was inspired by Shakespeare 's Romeo and Juliet. Meyer has expressed on numerous occasions that she had no hand in choosing the cover,  and said that she does not like it. She described it as "a very lovely ruffled tulip that means nothing at all".
However, the artwork team that designed the cover chose the image of a tulip losing one of its petals, aiming to represent Bella losing a drop of blood. When Meyer finished writing the book, she wanted a title that referred to a time of day to match Twilight. As it reflected the mood of the sequel, she titled the novel New Moon , "the darkest kind of night, a night with no moon", to refer to the darkest period of Bella's life.
It spent over 47 weeks in total on the list. By , Publishers Weekly reported that New Moon had sold 1.
The novel received mostly positive reviews with some critics feeling that it dragged in the middle. Hillias J. Martin of School Library Journal praised the book, saying, "Less streamlined than Twilight yet just as exciting, New Moon will more than feed the bloodthirsty hankerings of fans of the first volume and leave them breathless for the third".
This tale of tortured demon lovers entices. However, she gave the book 3. A film adaptation of New Moon was released on November 20, Quotations related to New Moon novel at Wikiquote. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. For the film adaptation of this novel, see The Twilight Saga: New Moon.
Main article: The Twilight Saga: New Moon: The Graphic Novel. Event occurs at Archived from the original on Retrieved Seattle Post-Intelligencer. New York Times. USA Today. Meyer's Deep Run". Publishers Weekly. Continue reading. Report this review. Parent of a 6 year old Written by twimom November 19, Love it--but not for elementary kids. Love the whole serious, however I know many kids in elementary school who have seen the movie and I do not think its appropriate for them AT ALL.
Parents need t Teen, 14 years old Written by Mayberry June 13, Me and my friends all think that. We think that because we believe that it's the m Teen, 13 years old Written by Gwen May 30, The best book in the series I loved the emerging friendship being Bella and Jacob.
This is the thrilling second book in Stephenie Meyer's bestselling vampire romance series. I loved i What's the story?
Is it any good? Talk to your kids about Book details Author: Stephenie Meyer Genre: Fantasy Topics: Magic and Fantasy Book type: Fiction Publisher: Little, Brown and Company Publication date: September 1, Publisher's recommended age s: Magic and Fantasy.
For kids who love romances and vampires. Our editors recommend. Catching Fire: The Hunger Games, Book 2. Sequel just as gripping -- and brutal -- as the first. Darkly funny book is full of Goth-chic style.
Something Like Fate. Easy read about the difficulties of love and friendship. Modern vampire tale for teens is funny, edgy, and grisly. The Twilight Saga, Book 1. Overlong but engrossing popular vampire romance. About these links Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase.
Read more. Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Print. Personalize Common Sense for your family. How old is your kid? Already a member? Sign in.
Awesome Bells. Stephenie Meyer stated that she is very happy to be able to continue working with Summit on the production of the saga. But her part is VERY small in this book like the plot , so we don't really need to talk about her. Chick has gone batshit crazy and she promptly busts her ass.