ppti.info Biography The End Of Illness Book

THE END OF ILLNESS BOOK

Wednesday, July 3, 2019


The End of Illness [David B. Agus M.D.] on ppti.info The End of Illness and millions of other books are available for instant access. view Kindle eBook. In the #1 New York Times bestselling The End of Illness, Dr. David Agus tackles these fundamental questions and dismantles misperceptions about what “health” really means. Dr. David B. Agus is one of the world’s leading cancer doctors and pioneering biomedical researchers. In the #1 New York Times bestselling The End of Illness, Dr. David Agus tackles these fundamental questions and dismantles misperceptions about what.


The End Of Illness Book

Author:LAVERNE ROUISSE
Language:English, Spanish, Indonesian
Country:Mozambique
Genre:Children & Youth
Pages:257
Published (Last):14.02.2015
ISBN:158-8-24564-315-9
ePub File Size:16.37 MB
PDF File Size:19.26 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Regsitration Required]
Downloads:25318
Uploaded by: MEGAN

David Agus's “The End of Illness” is a tour through medical concepts, of scientifically minded polemic, imperative self-help book and erudite. Jessica Warner reviews The End of Illness, by David B. Agus. What you will find in this book are clear and compelling reasons to be more. In The End of Illness, David B. Agus, MD, one of the world's leading This indispensable book is not only a manifesto—a call for revising the.

The breakthrough, when it comes, will come from an endeavour the author is vitally concerned in: proteomics. The thinking goes like this: Listen to what your body's proteins are saying and you will know what is going on at a cellular level inside you.

You will know, for example, whether your body is already undergoing the subtle changes that precede different types of cancer.

Take this thinking to the next step and a simple blood test will tell you whether you really need that colonoscopy. The body's proteins are so numerous, the changes they undergo so dynamic and the causes so multiple that proteomics presents a challenge that only supercomputing can possibly unravel. And Agus just so happens to have the hardware, the team and the will to do just that at his Physical Sciences in Oncology Center at the University of Southern California. Agus may very well be right.

But until he is proved right, he must fall back on certain unobjectionable tips designed to keep you alive for the 10 years or so it will take proteomics to realize its full potential. Story continues below advertisement Story continues below advertisement These tips are so unobjectionable that I can see no earthly reason for the legal disclaimer absolving the author of any responsibility for their consequences. Lose weight.

Trade Paperback. Hardcover eBook Unabridged Audio Download. Price may vary by retailer. Add to Cart Add to Cart. About The Book. About The Author. Photograph by Bryce Duffy. Product Details. Free Press October Length: Related Articles. Raves and Reviews. Awards and Honors. Heather's Pick - Fiction.

Resources and Downloads. The End of Illness Trade Paperback Get a FREE e-book by joining our mailing list today! More books from this author: Thank you for signing up, fellow book lover! See More Categories. Your First Name.

The End of Illness

Vaccines also target the system, but do so in a clever way—activating the immune system artificially by making it seem as though a foreign organism has invaded the body. We can actually trace our relationship to health to the study of cancer.

On a positive note, we can begin to see how we can shift direction and embrace a new frontier in the pursuit of health customized to each person, you and me. What is cancer? Your pathologist whom you will probably never meet will look for a certain pattern, because diagnosis today is by pattern recognition.

Does it look normal? Or does it look abnormal? To make an analogy, consider a plastic water bottle as emblematic of a cell. That is the state of the art today in diagnosing cancer.

There is no fancy examination of the chromosomes. This is how we do it. A Cancerous Perspective Cancer, as I explained earlier, is a great metaphor for anything related to sickness.

All of us fear learning that our body has turned against us—that cancer has struck and the future is uncertain. This uncertainty can be most unpleasant. Suddenly we cannot answer questions such as where, how, why, and when—as in when will I be cancer-free? Or, when will I die?

No foreign organism or contagion with a mind of its own and a cellular makeup unlike ours. Cancer is like a sleeping giant lying dormant in all of us. But occasionally, often when we least expect it, this giant manages to get past our trusty gatekeepers.

Something in our defense mechanisms breaks down, throwing off the checks and balances that came so automatically and reliably before, and this causes cellular dysfunction that leads to the growth of cancerous tumors. Cancer presents certain challenges not present in other illnesses, especially those that can easily be blamed on outsiders. I proposed that we take a big step back, take a twenty-thousand-foot view of disease.

I was as guilty as anyone else in this straying. I knew I had to provide some explanation to justify my statements and offer at least some hope for the future. I then shared how we had grown accustomed to a certain mode of thinking in the sciences that owes its origins to discoveries made a long time ago.

According to this theory, if you can figure out what species of germ you are infected with, then your problem is solved because that tells you how you should treat the disease. This became the general paradigm of medicine. Doctors would perform a laboratory test to determine what the infectious agent was, then apply a treatment that was specific for that agent or class of agents. That is why we use the same drug in every patient with a particular infectious disease.

The End of Illness, by David B. Agus

Which is precisely what doctors try to do: identify the disease—diagnose—and treat the diagnosis according to the best-known method. This strategy also allows science to participate because it can objectively test whether a particular treatment is effective when dealing with a given diagnosis. Does quinine help the symptoms of malaria? Is penicillin the best way to treat anthrax? This scientific approach to medicine is relatively new. Historically, doctors had theories that resembled the traditional Hindu system of ayurvedic medicine, with its emphasis on balances between various forces in the body.

But this approach to medicine and honoring the body as a whole was all but abandoned in the early twentieth century, especially in the West, where we became distracted by our triumph over infectious agents.

Haldane articulated the following at Cambridge on February 4, The recent history of medicine is as follows.

Account Options

But it also diverted scientific medicine from its former path, and it is probable that, were bacteria unknown, though many more people would die of sepsis and typhoid, we should be better able to cope with kidney disease and cancer.

Certain diseases such as cancer are probably not due to specific organisms, whilst others such as phthisis [a term for tuberculosis no longer used] are due to forms, which are fairly harmless to the average person, but attack others for unknown reasons.

Where the doctor cannot deal with the former, he can often keep the patient alive long enough to be able to do so himself. And here he has to rely largely on a knowledge of physiology.

The End of Illness

I do not say that a physiologist will discover how to prevent cancer. Pasteur started life as a crystallographer. But whoever does so is likely at least to make use of physiological data on a large scale.

The abolition of disease will make death a physiological event like sleep. A generation that has lived together will die together. Indeed, as a society, and as people desperately looking for culprits to blame for our health woes, we began to make assumptions. We started to assume that our ills originated from the outside world, which was the absolute wrong assumption to make when it came to afflictions that had nothing to do with germs and had everything to do with our inside world.

The Genetics of Infectious Thinking The germ theory spelled disaster for treating illnesses such as cancer because scientists and laypeople alike started thinking of them almost as if they were infectious diseases. It became a habit of thought that then established how people were treated, and which continues to this day. So when patients visit their doctor, they are diagnosed and placed in a category—e.

In the case of cancer, doctors treat it like an invader and try to cut it out or poison it.

Buy the Print Edition

The exact treatment protocol depends on which body part is involved, such as the breast or prostate. Diagnosing, categorizing, and treating make a lot of sense for infectious diseases because infections are species—they speciate and divide out, and as such need to be treated like the invaders that they are.

The problem also becomes one of scale: with infectious disease, we only need to consider one scale—the virus or bacterium. But with other human diseases, we need to consider multiple scales, such as the diseased cell, the organ it involves, other nearby organs, the whole body, and so on.

But this depiction tells only part of the story, leaving out a crucial component. I agree that cancer is often seen as symbolic of our modern culture of abundance, excess, and overproduction, but cancer is as old as the human race and has been documented since ancient history. Seven Egyptian papyri written between and BC describe syndromes consistent with our description of cancer.

One in particular, the Edwin Smith Papyrus, named after the man who procured or pilfered this fifteen-foot-long papyrus from an antiques seller in Luxor, Egypt, in , describes eight cases of tumors or ulcers of the breast.Mar 12, Gloria rated it liked it Shelves: This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

I just found this book annoying, but I think it would be a real insult to anyone who has a serious illness through no fault of their own.

In women followed in an observational study over 30 years, the more vitamin B6 or B12 a woman takes, the higher the… https: And while you're at it, ask your doctor whether you really need all those drugs you're taking. He supports what I've read elsewhere, which is that we all respond to drugs differently because of our unique genetic profiles.

Glad I can see through him! What they have in common with other cancerous cells is not only an abnormal shape but also rampant cellular proliferation—runaway cell growth under no control.

JACQUELYNN from Vermont
I do like reading books curiously. Review my other posts. I have only one hobby: table football.